So you have a story and you want everyone to read it. So you write it (or pay for it to be written) and put it up online where there is a good flow of ‘eyeballs’ or you call attention to it via social media, knowing that search loves nothing better than regularly updated content and that the more people who like the content, share the content and link back to the content, the better search likes it.
And then you put a paywall around it.
And wonder why, when no one can read it or link to it, your traffic suddenly falls away dramatically… enter The Times Newspaper Group, who must be getting seriously worried about the situation that they have created over at Murdoch Towers, although to listen to the spin emanating you’d think that it was the stats and the people who are wrong, not the paywall.
And interestingly for us – The Times fans to a girl – we thought it would be an issue and said so because we’ve seen something similar before, albeit on a much smaller scale. Here’s how it goes.
Business has a story to tell – maybe it’s won a big contract, an award or appointed the dream girl as CEO. It approaches The PR Co to help them tell the world, hoping that by doing so it would raise Business’s profile and sell more Stuff.
However, most traditional PR companies don’t understand how to pitch at bloggers (PR pros tend to send blanket emails because they are ‘too busy’ and anyway bloggers don’t really count… bloggers – and journos come to that – don’t like blanket emails, strange that, so they don’t use the release) and instead pitch publications and newspapers in the traditional manner, and say The Times uses the story.. nice. But it’s behind a paywall… not nice.
Because that means The PR Co has ‘told the world’, yes, but isn’t it a small world when it’s a world behind a paywall? A world without the help of the power of sharing or liking or retweeting or bookmarking? So in this instance no one much hears the story and so Business loses money because it didn’t achieve its objective to tell ‘the whole world’ and so it didn’t sell more Stuff.
So The Times appear to be paying its wonderful staff to write wonderful articles (stand up Caitlin Moran and wave your bra) that are not just not being read, but are not being seen, not being linked to, shared, liked, retweeted… which so MUST be dramatically affecting their advertising rates because, er, no one is reading… and advertising revenue is dependent on those all-important eyeballs.
In fact, I think we have just solved the conundrum of whether a tree falling in a forest without anyone seeing it fall has actually fallen. It actually DIDN’T because actually, however large that tree is, if it isn’t seen it doesn’t register in human consciousness.
And the same applies to your news, whether you are Murdoch at The Times or a solo biz peep – tell your story and SHARE it with as many people as possible, else it doesn’t count, and neither do you.
Want to share your business news and story effectively with the whole world? Call us now on 0845 862 0017 for a no obligation chat, or email us at hello@themediamarketingco.com.




